by famous and infamous, John McFee, a successful millionaire business builder and then seller.
John D. McAfee's Roanoke College commencement address
Following is a transcript of McAfee's speech.
Thank you, Dr. Maxey, for that optimistic description of myself.
Congratulations, Class of 2008. Congratulations, Jake. Congratulations, Megan.
I
watched your faces as you walked in and you were 100 percent glowing
with anticipation, relief. I saw a few doubts, and maybe some of you did
not finish your term paper, and you're afraid they may find out before
you actually get up here, but beyond that, this is a marvelous time in
your life.
I came prepared
with an address. I thought it was marvelous, and yesterday I tore it up.
I tore it up because my good friend Richard Cornett listened to me as I
read it to him. I was convinced that 100 years from now they would be
circulating this address as the premier example of the perfect public
address. Richard's comment was, "well … impersonal, abstract and
boring." And indeed it was. He told me that I needed to relate it to my
own experience. And that's quite true. I knew that … any good public
speaker knows that.
Yet my
personal experience, from a standpoint of giving direction to a college
graduating class, seemed like a radical guideline to me.
We
could begin with my work ethic. Work has never appealed to me, and the
bulk of my career was spent avoiding it. My rhythm was working until I
had saved enough money to travel the world for a year or two. Then I
would quit and travel the world. Wherever I ended up, when I ran out of
money, I would get another job. As a consequence, the longest I ever
held a position was three years, and that was while I was at McAfee. And
my average position lasted about 18 months.
It
would be nice to say that after I achieved a degree of financial
success, that my habits changed, but that was not the case. After three
years at McAfee, I had had enough. I hired an executive to replace me,
resigned, spent two years on the road, and never went back.
Later
I become frustrated with e-mail's lack of flexibility so I developed
instant messaging. Tribal Voice was the result. Two years later, I sold
that company and hit the road yet one more time.
So, my work ethic is not something a sane person could use as a sound basis for advice.
My
persona as it relates to the business world fares no better. Today, for
the first time in 23 years, I am wearing a suit. I am doing this not so
I can fit in but so that I do not cause embarrassment to my host. Since
I graduated from this school 41 years ago, I can count on my fingers
the number of times I have worn a suit.
My
business attire is a T-shirt and blue jeans. If I am in warmer
climates, it's tank tops and shorts. I favor sandals for footwear. I am
tattooed from my shoulder to my waist and down both of my arms-and it's
not the happy Mom-type of tattoos. I have, more than once, been denied
entrance by security people to affairs at which I was the keynote
speaker. Had Dr. Maxey known this prior to my invitation, someone else
might be speaking to you today.
So
I would have difficulty finding some aspect of my business persona that
might in any way benefit you. And my business methodology is, sadly to
say, nothing to recommend. I have never developed a business plan. I
have never created a sales forecast, a competitive analysis, a marketing
analysis or a product development schedule. It's not that I don't know
how to do these things; it's just that they seem to me to be superfluous
to the process of building a product and making money from it. I never
had a staff meeting or formed a committee. In my companies' structures, I
have never had a marketing division or a sales division, or a single
marketing or sales employee.
When
I left McAfee, the company was valued at half a billion dollars, and it
didn't have a single salesman or marketeer or a secretary for that
matter. I have a number of times spoken to Stanford's business school
students, and while the students seemed somewhat interested in my
ramblings, the professors generally appeared to be in shock. So I
suspect that my business methodology is something that I should not
advise you to follow. But if I am honest, I do have to say the
following.
The success of my
anti-virus venture rested solely on my abandoning the norms of the
accepted business practices of the time. If any of you have studied the
history of software development, you will have discovered that in the
mid-1980s every software company was obsessed with how to prevent users
from copying their software and using it without paying for it.
That
seemed like an absurd occupation to me. So I came up with a new idea
and decided to distribute my software for free. And even added a
headline in the opening page that read: Please, steal this software.
The
software became a world standard overnight. The money came by charging
for upgrades to an existing user base of 30 million, who paid nothing to
become users, but who paid yearly fees ever after to remain users. This
distribution practice was later called freeware, and it became an
integral part of the software world's business model.
My
other ventures all shared some departure from the norm. This doesn't
mean that if you develop a cavalier attitude toward work, tattoo
yourself from head-to-toe and abandon all accepted business practices,
you will be successful in business or in any other aspect of your life. I
would not, in fact, recommend any of the above.
But,
questioning the authority of accepted ideas is not always a bad
thing-whether these ideas relate to business, culture, relationships or
even religious beliefs. I might go further and say that questioning all
authority might not be a bad thing. You may not be aware that you submit
to authority, but you do. You submit to the authority of fashion, the
authority of your cultural icons and the authority of your religion. The
authority of your own knowledge-an authority, by the way, that has been
greatly increased during these past few years-is probably your greatest
authority.
Even if you are a
rebel, and I hope, by the way, there are many of you that meet that
classification, see that your rebellion is merely a quest for a new
authority. The old authority has lost its ability to compel your
obedience, so you seek one that can. And please, I'm not suggesting you
run out and thumb your noses at the police. Authority that is
accompanied by physical force should, in most circumstances, be
meticulously obeyed.
But the
remaining authorities, the truly important authorities, only have the
power that you choose to give them. I ask you to question your
authorities because there is a burdensome cost to authority. The
authority of the ideal, for example, creates conflict between yourself
and the imperfect world around you, and it causes a struggle between who
you are and who you believe you should be. The authority of tradition
restricts your ability to think and act freely in changing
circumstances. And the authority of your value system may cause you to
shun priceless gems of experience.
So
if you make an authority of this knowledge that you have spent the last
few years cultivating, then you create a flawed master for
yourself-flawed because personal knowledge is memory, and memory
responds with predictability. So there is no freedom in it.
The
knowledge that composes memories' contents is likewise flawed.
Historical knowledge is a mere shadow of a past reality. Scientific
knowledge is obliterated or transformed with each new discovery. So it
is ephemeral, transitory, fleeting. It is merely the anticipation of
what might come next. All types of knowledge are similarly flawed. And
in spite of its flaws, the authority that accompanies knowledge has an
inherent arrogance-a sense of conceit that is truly incongruous with its
limitations. It is the entity that makes you right and others wrong.
Knowing
the precepts of your own religion, for example, allows you to see the
errors in the religions of others. And it allows you to stroll blindly
down paths that it has no real power to illuminate. As such, I would
suggest that authority of knowledge is the source of absurdity. And lest
I be forcibly removed from the stage, I'm not suggesting that you
abandon knowledge, merely its authority.
You
will want to solve problems as you go out into the world and encounter
its tragedies and cruelties. But no problem can be addressed until it is
first seen in its purest form. And if you see the world through an
authority which, at best, is a coarse approximation of reality, then how
will you see the pure form of anything? Many of you are yearning for
truth, for what's really happening. This is a natural expression of a
youthful and inquisitive mind, which I hope you all have. And you may
wonder how truth is possible without authority.
But
authority is finite, rigid and narrow. Truth is the actuality of what
is happening. It is infinite. It is too grand to be contained within
authority.
So, question every
idea that begs to be obeyed. Resist accepted patterns. Be skeptical of
the majority. Meet every event fresh, unencumbered by presuppositions.
And see that if we all walk the same road, there could be no
discoveries, no mysteries, no new things. So make your own path.
Strike
out in the heart of the wilderness and claim everything that presents
itself as your own-no matter how contradictory or strange it may seem to
the rest of the world. And don't be afraid. The least trodden path is
always the sweetest.
Thank you.
Released: May 14, 2008Contact Name: Public Relations
Contact Phone: (540) 375-2282
Contact Email: gereaux@roanoke.edu
1 comment:
Been using Kaspersky security for many years now, I would recommend this solution to all you.
Post a Comment